← Maryland

Tap water quality report

Town of Princess Anne

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
23
detected
3,300
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Somerset

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
304
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-10-01 → 1991-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-10-01 → 1991-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1162 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3800 µg/L
77/81 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
123.146 µg/L 154%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 138.39 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
33.722 µg/L 56%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.9 µg/L
29/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
55.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 78 µg/L
26/36 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromodichloromethane
37.825 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.7 µg/L
22/36 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
8.34 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
20/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
23.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.7 µg/L
18/36 SYR4 2012–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
15.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2017
Lead
0.0031 mg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Bromoform
12.6995 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.2 µg/L
12/36 SYR4 2012–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
20.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2012–2017
Lithium
14.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
12/14 UCMR-5 2024
Gross Beta Particle Activity
7.265 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 pCi/L
10/16 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
12.068 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.3 µg/L
9/13 SYR4 2012–2017
Nitrate
120 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/134 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
3 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
5/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
22.595 µg/L 226%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
4/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
3.45 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
3/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Beryllium, Total
2 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
1/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.9000 pCi/L 18%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2016
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Adipate
0.0400 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 400 µg/L
1/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.1900 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Mercury
0.0840 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/30 SYR4 2012–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TAYLOR, JOSHUA
Phone
410-651-3831
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Town of Princess Anne

Is Town of Princess Anne tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Town of Princess Anne's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Town of Princess Anne's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Town of Princess Anne serve?

Town of Princess Anne reports serving 3,300 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.

Has Town of Princess Anne had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 304 violations on file for Town of Princess Anne, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.