Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-02-01 → 2000-02-29 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1991-12-01 → 1991-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1991-12-01 → 1991-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-06-01 → 2023-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-06-01 → 2023-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-06-01 → 2023-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-06-01 → 2023-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 9.7 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L | 95/101 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 6.495 µg/L 8.1% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L | 88/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.948 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.8 µg/L | 37/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 36/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 660 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 950 µg/L | 33/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.611 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 30/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.48 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 29/122 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 7.64 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 pCi/L | 13/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2013 |
| Lithium | 19.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/26 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Barium | 18.65 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 4/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 3/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Bromoform | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Toluene | 2 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Patuxent Naval Air Station (Navfac-Wash)
Is Patuxent Naval Air Station (Navfac-Wash) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Patuxent Naval Air Station (Navfac-Wash)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Patuxent Naval Air Station (Navfac-Wash)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Patuxent Naval Air Station (Navfac-Wash) serve?
Patuxent Naval Air Station (Navfac-Wash) reports serving 22,000 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.
Has Patuxent Naval Air Station (Navfac-Wash) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 161 violations on file for Patuxent Naval Air Station (Navfac-Wash), of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.