Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-06-01 → 1999-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0027 mg/L 18% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2023 |
| Chloroform | 3.796 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Fluoride | 199 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| TTHM | 6.085 µg/L 7.6% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.65 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.7095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.71 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.199 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.8500 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.03 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.3 pCi/L 22% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 17.3 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 6.03 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.15 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
85 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about White Plains 2 Mhp/Jack Blair
Is White Plains 2 Mhp/Jack Blair tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in White Plains 2 Mhp/Jack Blair's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in White Plains 2 Mhp/Jack Blair's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Chloroform, Fluoride, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does White Plains 2 Mhp/Jack Blair serve?
White Plains 2 Mhp/Jack Blair reports serving 70 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.
Has White Plains 2 Mhp/Jack Blair had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 67 violations on file for White Plains 2 Mhp/Jack Blair, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.