← Maryland

Tap water quality report

Chapel Point Wds/ Jude House/ Comm Ctr

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
13
detected
280
people served
30
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Charles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

30
health-based violations
35
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
19.705 pCi/L 131%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 39.8 pCi/L
120/150 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2023
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.665 pCi/L 53%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.8 pCi/L
10/21 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
5.755 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 pCi/L
8/28 SYR4 2012–2016
Chloroform
16.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/16 SYR4 2012–2014
Barium
11.37 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
890 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 900 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
21.837 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
9.45 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
0.7400 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2012–2014
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2014
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2014
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GILES, TIM
Phone
301-609-5647
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Chapel Point Wds/ Jude House/ Comm Ctr

Is Chapel Point Wds/ Jude House/ Comm Ctr tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Chapel Point Wds/ Jude House/ Comm Ctr's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Chapel Point Wds/ Jude House/ Comm Ctr's water?

EPA monitoring detected Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Beta Particle Activity, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Chapel Point Wds/ Jude House/ Comm Ctr serve?

Chapel Point Wds/ Jude House/ Comm Ctr reports serving 280 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.

Has Chapel Point Wds/ Jude House/ Comm Ctr had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 35 violations on file for Chapel Point Wds/ Jude House/ Comm Ctr, of which 30 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.