Is Cross Point Subdivision Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Calvert

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2014-10-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2011-10-01
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2008-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	10/10	LCR	2023
Chloroform	5.7 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2012–2017
Bromodichloromethane	1.52 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L	5/6	SYR4	2012–2017
Fluoride	216 µg/L 5.4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 220 µg/L	5/5	SYR4	2012–2018
TTHM	8.34 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	7.475 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2012–2018
Arsenic	2.39 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L	3/5	SYR4	2012–2018
Barium	55.9 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 56 µg/L	3/5	SYR4	2012–2018
Nitrate	750 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	2/18	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	3.6545 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2012–2014
Dichloroacetic Acid	3.9 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/2	SYR4	2012–2014
Gross Beta Particle Activity	6.9 pCi/L No EPA limit set	1/1	SYR4	2015

59 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: SCIANNELLA, EMMA
Phone: 667-404-0708
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cross Point Subdivision

Is Cross Point Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Cross Point Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cross Point Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Fluoride, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cross Point Subdivision serve?

Cross Point Subdivision reports serving 434 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.

Has Cross Point Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 3 violations on file for Cross Point Subdivision, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.