Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 10.66 µg/L 107% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.9 µg/L | 67/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 9.64 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.201 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 14/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Fluoride | 465 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 470 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.708 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 7/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 20.64 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.2 µg/L | 7/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 3/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 2/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 7.26 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Ethylbenzene | 2.71 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Xylenes, Total | 19.51 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Chesapeake Ranch Estates
Is Chesapeake Ranch Estates tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Chesapeake Ranch Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Chesapeake Ranch Estates's water?
EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Chesapeake Ranch Estates serve?
Chesapeake Ranch Estates reports serving 9,500 people in Maryland, per its EPA record.
Has Chesapeake Ranch Estates had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Chesapeake Ranch Estates, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.