Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-06-07 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 4 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 35/43 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Copper | 200 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 31/43 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Arsenic | 20.1 µg/L 201% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 20/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 580 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 21.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.382 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 33.92 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.1 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.045 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.22 µg/L | 11/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 6/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 237.5 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.025 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 6/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 192.5 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.2505 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 4/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 0.4160 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.4200 µg/L | 3/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dalapon | 2.172 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.7950 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.01695 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.04 pCi/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Lithium | 15.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 0.2800 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 3.62 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
90 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about New Carroll Water
Is New Carroll Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in New Carroll Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in New Carroll Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Arsenic, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does New Carroll Water serve?
New Carroll Water reports serving 3,507 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has New Carroll Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 106 violations on file for New Carroll Water, of which 47 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.