Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-02-27 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-02-27 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2026-02-27 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 25.005 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 190.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 278 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 119.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 328.105 µg/L 410% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 372 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.81 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.45 µg/L | 59/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 50.68 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71.4 µg/L | 57/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 59.6 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 80.5 µg/L | 57/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 400 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 600 µg/L | 21/32 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 13.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.8 µg/L | 21/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 20.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.5 µg/L | 21/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 13.5 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 16/32 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0012 mg/L 8% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 400 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 71 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.5460 µg/L 9.1% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5500 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 7.405 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 0.9595 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9700 µg/L | 2/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.2230 pCi/L 4.5% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2018 |
59 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Wards Chapel Water
Is Wards Chapel Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Wards Chapel Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Wards Chapel Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Wards Chapel Water serve?
Wards Chapel Water reports serving 1,620 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has Wards Chapel Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 527 violations on file for Wards Chapel Water, of which 455 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.