← Louisiana

Tap water quality report

St Mary Par Jt Water Sewer Commission 5

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 82 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

82
contaminants tested
23
detected
1,240
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
St. Mary Parish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
37
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-06-15 → 1998-07-14
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-06-15 → 1998-07-14
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
28.505 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 61 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
18.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
51/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
17.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.9 µg/L
51/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
8.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.1 µg/L
51/52 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
53.95 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.9 µg/L
51/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
51/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
15.865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.3 µg/L
50/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.06 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L
49/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
48/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
7.85 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
24/34 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
34.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49 µg/L
19/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
660 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
12/34 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0031 mg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2025
Fluoride
160 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
385.5 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
71.2 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 72 µg/L
3/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.5475 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5500 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
2.27 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.28 pCi/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
64 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016
Selenium
0.7190 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7200 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.8450 pCi/L 17%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.6900 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.7600 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/52 SYR4 2012–2019
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SAUCIER, RICKY B
Phone
337-276-3668
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about St Mary Par Jt Water Sewer Commission 5

Is St Mary Par Jt Water Sewer Commission 5 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in St Mary Par Jt Water Sewer Commission 5's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in St Mary Par Jt Water Sewer Commission 5's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does St Mary Par Jt Water Sewer Commission 5 serve?

St Mary Par Jt Water Sewer Commission 5 reports serving 1,240 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.

Has St Mary Par Jt Water Sewer Commission 5 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 37 violations on file for St Mary Par Jt Water Sewer Commission 5, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.