Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-02-19 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-02-19 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 → 2016-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.97 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 54.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56.5 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 59.975 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.2 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.0205 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.43 µg/L | 10/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00049 mg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 2 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 10/33 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 600 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 100 µg/L 7.7% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 8/33 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.01 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.2 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 200 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 8/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 39.955 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 41.6 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 18.29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.2 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.7050 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7200 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 7.0795 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.39 µg/L | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.0329 pCi/L 21% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.05 pCi/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 0.9475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9500 µg/L | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 4.77 pCi/L 32% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2016 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.18 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
62 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Pointe Coupee Wwks District 2 - Hwy 10
Is Pointe Coupee Wwks District 2 - Hwy 10 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Pointe Coupee Wwks District 2 - Hwy 10's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Pointe Coupee Wwks District 2 - Hwy 10's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Pointe Coupee Wwks District 2 - Hwy 10 serve?
Pointe Coupee Wwks District 2 - Hwy 10 reports serving 2,401 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has Pointe Coupee Wwks District 2 - Hwy 10 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 18 violations on file for Pointe Coupee Wwks District 2 - Hwy 10, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.