← Louisiana

Tap water quality report

Cadeville Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
23
detected
6,219
people served
357
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ouachita Parish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

357
health-based violations
506
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
60.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
52.14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56.6 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
171.86 µg/L 215%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
21.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
52/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
52.67 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56.8 µg/L
52/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
71.4 µg/L 119%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 73.3 µg/L
51/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
15.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
50/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
24.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.5 µg/L
48/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
21.825 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.6 µg/L
46/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.6 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
29/34 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
470 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 600 µg/L
27/34 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
33.205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.6 µg/L
10/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
99 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
10/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
482.5 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.585 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
8/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Barium
7.985 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Dalapon
2.736 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.1055 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.14 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Lithium
10.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/8 UCMR-5 2024
Antimony, Total
1 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Toluene
0.6600 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2014–2017
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TURNER, BARRY L
Phone
318-644-2090
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cadeville Water District

Is Cadeville Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Cadeville Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cadeville Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cadeville Water District serve?

Cadeville Water District reports serving 6,219 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.

Has Cadeville Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 506 violations on file for Cadeville Water District, of which 357 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.