Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
0
health-based violations
19
violations on file
0
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-10 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-10 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-05-31 |
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 3 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 97/182 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 500 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 900 µg/L | 95/182 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 358 µg/L 9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 19 µg/L No EPA limit set | 29/34 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| TTHM | 17.19 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.6 µg/L | 27/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 6.955 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L | 24/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.88 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 23/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.865 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 22/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 500 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/262 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.49 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 12/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2023 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 4.68 µg/L 78% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.89 µg/L | 11/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.2 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 10/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 9/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 8/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 26.1 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 8/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.84 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 7/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.2284 pCi/L 25% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.34 pCi/L | 5/24 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 5/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.49 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 3/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.087 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 3/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 1.538 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.54 pCi/L | 2/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 21.393 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.48 µg/L | 2/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 1.1 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 1.05 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 0.5600 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ward Ii Water District
Is Ward Ii Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Ward Ii Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ward Ii Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Fluoride, Lithium, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ward Ii Water District serve?
Ward Ii Water District reports serving 78,147 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.
Has Ward Ii Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 19 violations on file for Ward Ii Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.