← Louisiana

Tap water quality report

Cameron Parish Ww District 11-sweet Lake

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
21
detected
3,507
people served
41
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cameron Parish

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

41
health-based violations
43
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
23.765 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.8 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
14.695 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
13.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.6 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
37.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.4 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
87.86 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 93.6 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
19.745 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.7 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
6.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L
23/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.215 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
20/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
410 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
19/52 SYR4 2014–2018
Fluoride
309 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 330 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2023
Barium
268 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
5/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.7000 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7300 µg/L
4/16 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
1100 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
27.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2023
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.142 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 pCi/L
2/10 SYR4 2012–2015
Lead
1 µg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
2/52 SYR4 2014–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
1.3 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/17 SYR4 2012–2018
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GRANGER, CARL
Phone
337-598-3439
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cameron Parish Ww District 11-sweet Lake

Is Cameron Parish Ww District 11-sweet Lake tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Cameron Parish Ww District 11-sweet Lake's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cameron Parish Ww District 11-sweet Lake's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cameron Parish Ww District 11-sweet Lake serve?

Cameron Parish Ww District 11-sweet Lake reports serving 3,507 people in Louisiana, per its EPA record.

Has Cameron Parish Ww District 11-sweet Lake had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 43 violations on file for Cameron Parish Ww District 11-sweet Lake, of which 41 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.