← Indiana

Tap water quality report

Borden Tri-County Region

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
15
detected
11,000
people served
105
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Clark

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

105
health-based violations
396
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
96.35 µg/L 120%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 110.4 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
73.425 µg/L 122%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 111.2 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
541.15 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 544 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2017
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2023
Nitrate
710 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1027.84 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1116.6 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2015
Chloroform
37.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.4 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2015
Gross Beta Particle Activity
2.309 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2018
Arsenic
1.28 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
167.05 µg/L 8.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 171 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.065 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
2/20 SYR4 2017
Antimony, Total
0.9000 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.5000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2015
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.3000 pCi/L 2%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2017–2018
91 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromateBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NAVILLE, GRANT
Phone
502-715-1412
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Borden Tri-County Region

Is Borden Tri-County Region tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Borden Tri-County Region's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Borden Tri-County Region's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Borden Tri-County Region serve?

Borden Tri-County Region reports serving 11,000 people in Indiana, per its EPA record.

Has Borden Tri-County Region had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 396 violations on file for Borden Tri-County Region, of which 105 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.