Is Rosewood Hills Property Hoa Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Teller

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

129

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	3600 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.00050 mg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	14/14	LCR	2025
Fluoride	3465 µg/L 87% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 3500 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2018
TTHM	20.905 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 29.2 µg/L	8/9	SYR4	2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	8.075 pCi/L 161% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 8.1 pCi/L	6/6	SYR4	2017–2019
Bromodichloromethane	1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L	5/7	SYR4	2015–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.1 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L	5/7	SYR4	2015–2019
Barium	148.5 µg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 150 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2012–2018
Bromoform	1.398 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L	4/7	SYR4	2015–2019
Chloroform	23.4725 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 27.5 µg/L	4/7	SYR4	2015–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	54.44 µg/L 91% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 60 µg/L	3/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Beryllium, Total	0.7880 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L worst single sample: 0.7900 µg/L	2/4	SYR4	2012–2018
Combined Uranium	4.855 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.295 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L	2/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	10.631 pCi/L 71% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 10.7 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	3448 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 3600 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2013–2017
Selenium	0.8930 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 0.9100 µg/L	2/4	SYR4	2012–2018
Cadmium	0.1200 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L	1/4	SYR4	2012–2018
Dichloromethane	0.5900 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L	1/4	SYR4	2013–2018
Dalapon	2.1 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L	1/4	SYR4	2013–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity	22 pCi/L No EPA limit set	1/1	SYR4	2017
Monochloroacetic Acid	3.1 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Nitrite	4.4 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L	1/2	SYR4	2013–2017

56 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneChlorobenzeneCyanideCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: SUTTON, CHRIS
Phone: 719-687-0167
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rosewood Hills Property Hoa

Is Rosewood Hills Property Hoa tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Rosewood Hills Property Hoa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rosewood Hills Property Hoa's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Fluoride, TTHM, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rosewood Hills Property Hoa serve?

Rosewood Hills Property Hoa reports serving 135 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Rosewood Hills Property Hoa had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 129 violations on file for Rosewood Hills Property Hoa, of which 90 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.