Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-04-01 → 2002-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-04-01 → 2002-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-04-01 → 2002-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 530 µg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 550 µg/L | 46/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0050 mg/L 33% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2023 |
| TTHM | 20.65 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.6 µg/L | 16/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 10.52 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.6 µg/L | 14/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 264.2 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 2.5 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2.21 pCi/L 15% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.36 pCi/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L | 10/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 10/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 6.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L | 9/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.03 pCi/L 41% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.1 pCi/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 5/11 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 520 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 550 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 1 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 5/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 2 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 4/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 3/11 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.495 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 2/11 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 1.195 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 pCi/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Carbofuran | 0.3200 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 40 µg/L | 1/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Copper Mountain Consolidated Md
Is Copper Mountain Consolidated Md tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Copper Mountain Consolidated Md's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Copper Mountain Consolidated Md's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Copper Mountain Consolidated Md serve?
Copper Mountain Consolidated Md reports serving 5,785 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has Copper Mountain Consolidated Md had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Copper Mountain Consolidated Md, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.