Is Catamount Md Lake Property Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water under surface influence
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Routt

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Lead	0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	16/16	LCR	2025
Nitrate	800 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	16/32	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	60.655 µg/L 76% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 68 µg/L	14/17	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	12.85 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 13.5 µg/L	11/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	47.6 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 52.5 µg/L	11/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	32.245 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 34 µg/L	10/11	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	1.92 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2 µg/L	9/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Fluoride	712 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 720 µg/L	9/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Arsenic	3.06 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L	8/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	55.6 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 57 µg/L	8/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Combined Uranium	2.125 µg/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2018–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	779 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 800 µg/L	8/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	0.5340 pCi/L 11% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 0.5400 pCi/L	7/8	SYR4	2018–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	16.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 17.5 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2015–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	3.025 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.2 pCi/L	6/6	SYR4	2018–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	16.65 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2015–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	1.94 pCi/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 2 pCi/L	5/8	SYR4	2018–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate	0.8755 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L worst single sample: 0.8900 µg/L	2/14	SYR4	2012–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid	1.57 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L	2/6	SYR4	2015–2019
Diquat	0.2500 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 20 µg/L	1/10	SYR4	2012–2017
Ethylene Dibromide	0.0280 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L	1/17	SYR4	2012–2019
Hexachlorobenzene	0.0170 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 1 µg/L	1/10	SYR4	2012–2017
Xylenes, Total	0.5200 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	1/16	SYR4	2012–2019

57 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: ANDERSON, JOEL A
Phone: 970-871-6989
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Catamount Md Lake Property

Is Catamount Md Lake Property tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Catamount Md Lake Property's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Catamount Md Lake Property's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Catamount Md Lake Property serve?

Catamount Md Lake Property reports serving 219 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.

Has Catamount Md Lake Property had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 10 violations on file for Catamount Md Lake Property, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.