Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 78.98 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.7 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 57.26 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.9 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 160 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 270 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 30 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 38 µg/L | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.17 pCi/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.7 pCi/L | 27/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 212 µg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L | 25/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 69.23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 73 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 3.1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 9/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.155 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.8 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 41.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.1 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 3.42 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 pCi/L | 7/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.585 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.8800 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.4 pCi/L 28% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dalapon | 2.2 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 45 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
89 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about North Table Mountain Wsd
Is North Table Mountain Wsd tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in North Table Mountain Wsd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in North Table Mountain Wsd's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, Barium, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does North Table Mountain Wsd serve?
North Table Mountain Wsd reports serving 10,000 people in Colorado, per its EPA record.
Has North Table Mountain Wsd had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for North Table Mountain Wsd, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.