Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-05-01 → 2012-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.4495 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.77 µg/L | 250/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 15.974 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.76 µg/L | 250/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 53.4495 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.38 µg/L | 250/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 20.152 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.97 µg/L | 249/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 24.33 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.93 µg/L | 241/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 13.56 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.7 µg/L | 223/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.065 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.1 µg/L | 208/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6.68 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 143/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 3470 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4400 µg/L | 114/138 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L | 53/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 26/26 | LCR | 2024 |
| Fluoride | 209 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 163.5 µg/L 8.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L | 14/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2900 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 9/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 1.067 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 8/35 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lithium | 14 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/10 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Arsenic | 2.1 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 13 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.4381 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 0.1480 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
91 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of San Jose - Evg/Edv/Coy
Is City of San Jose - Evg/Edv/Coy tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in City of San Jose - Evg/Edv/Coy's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of San Jose - Evg/Edv/Coy's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of San Jose - Evg/Edv/Coy serve?
City of San Jose - Evg/Edv/Coy reports serving 101,265 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has City of San Jose - Evg/Edv/Coy had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 5 violations on file for City of San Jose - Evg/Edv/Coy, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.