Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 2000-04-04 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1800 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2056.6 µg/L | 46/96 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 45.29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 59 µg/L | 34/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 52.85 µg/L 66% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65.2 µg/L | 34/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 38.6 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L | 31/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 132 µg/L 6.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 153 µg/L | 25/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 13.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 25/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 12.95 µg/L 130% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 22/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 960000 µg/L 9600% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000000 µg/L | 9/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 3 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 7/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 7/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.55 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.77 pCi/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.61263 µg/L 5.4% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.7731 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Lead | 1.655 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 4/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 4/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 190 µg/L 4.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 3/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 2.115 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 2/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 30 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Mercury | 0.0200 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
58 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Stockton East Water District
Is Stockton East Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Stockton East Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Stockton East Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Stockton East Water District serve?
Stockton East Water District reports serving 50 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Stockton East Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 3 violations on file for Stockton East Water District, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.