← California

Tap water quality report

Sweetwater Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 112 contaminants and detected 30. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

112
contaminants tested
30
detected
191,282
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
San Diego

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
2
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0123 µg/L 4/9 2025
PFBS 0.0110 µg/L 4/9 2025
Pfhpa 0.0047 µg/L 4/9 2025
Pfhxa 0.0086 µg/L 4/9 2025
PFHXS 0.0094 µg/L 4/9 2025
PFOA 0.0114 µg/L 4/9 2025
Pfpea 0.0076 µg/L 4/9 2025
PFOS 0.0057 µg/L 3/9 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
45.71 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64 µg/L
610/635 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
9.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
606/635 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
17.39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.3 µg/L
602/635 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
14.165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
590/635 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
14.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.7 µg/L
584/635 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
32.1 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
300/310 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
294/310 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
289/310 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
259/310 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
651.3 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 830 µg/L
258/280 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L
117/310 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
114/310 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
180 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 210 µg/L
79/277 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
3.87 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
44/277 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
30/30 LCR 2023
Gross Beta Particle Activity
15.25 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 pCi/L
26/27 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
14.85 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
24/277 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
12.3521 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.0375 µg/L
22/38 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
500 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/560 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
500 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
6/257 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/9 UCMR-5 2025
Copper
85.7 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 86 µg/L
3/300 SYR4 2012–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
QUINTERO, CARLOS
Phone
619-409-6701
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Sweetwater Authority

Is Sweetwater Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 30 contaminants in Sweetwater Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sweetwater Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sweetwater Authority serve?

Sweetwater Authority reports serving 191,282 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Sweetwater Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2 violations on file for Sweetwater Authority, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.