Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-08-01 → 1987-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-01-01 → 2015-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 21470 µg/L 215% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 22600 µg/L | 512/534 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 71 µg/L 89% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L | 241/280 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 217/284 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 200/284 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 196/279 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L | 180/284 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 16.95 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 162/259 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 149/259 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 141/259 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.46 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 109/259 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE | 0.2600 µg/L 130% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 0.2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3400 µg/L | 106/179 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 21000 µg/L 210% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 22000 µg/L | 79/87 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 14 µg/L 280% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 24 µg/L | 64/92 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 2.13 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 58/92 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 420 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 440 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 4.605 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 20/88 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2023 |
| Combined Uranium | 8.1205 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.344 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/259 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 9.24 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 pCi/L | 3/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Copper | 380 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Upland, City of
Is Upland, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Upland, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Upland, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Upland, City of serve?
Upland, City of reports serving 78,376 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Upland, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 5 violations on file for Upland, City of, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.