Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 6102 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8136 µg/L | 536/538 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 6.04 µg/L 7.6% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 69/105 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.805 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 60/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 730 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 54/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 41/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0078 mg/L 52% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 37/37 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromoform | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 35/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 15.9 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 22/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 2.59856 µg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8144 µg/L | 17/19 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 15.85 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 14/105 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 10.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 11/105 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Barium | 28.25 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 29 µg/L | 6/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 1.982 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.16 pCi/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.13 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 4/105 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE | 0.0476 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0480 µg/L | 3/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 2/105 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 15.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 2/105 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Copper | 240 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/105 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 6.5 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
91 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Beaumont Cherry Valley Wd
Is Beaumont Cherry Valley Wd tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Beaumont Cherry Valley Wd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Beaumont Cherry Valley Wd's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Beaumont Cherry Valley Wd serve?
Beaumont Cherry Valley Wd reports serving 66,841 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Beaumont Cherry Valley Wd had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Beaumont Cherry Valley Wd, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.