← California

Tap water quality report

Beverly Hills-City, Water Dept.

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 111 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

111
contaminants tested
23
detected
40,121
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Los Angeles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
91
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-12-01 → 2012-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-12-01 → 2012-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2011-01-01 → 2013-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2011-01-01 → 2013-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2011-01-01 → 2013-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2011-01-01 → 2013-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1253 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1600 µg/L
555/576 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
52.495 µg/L 525%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.6 µg/L
208/298 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
12.435 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.5 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
15.745 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.6 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
14.705 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.6 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
43.795 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.7 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
24.505 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.7 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
15.345 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L
112/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.465 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
111/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
11.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.4 µg/L
111/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
7.1145 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.63 µg/L
84/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
45/45 LCR 2024
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.8865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
28/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
10.034 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.7 µg/L
14/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.5 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.59 pCi/L
7/8 SYR4 2017–2018
Combined Uranium
3.25416 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5462 µg/L
5/9 SYR4 2015–2018
Dichloromethane
5.246 µg/L 105%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
5/26 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
47 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/6 UCMR-5 2023
Nitrate
24.182 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/72 SYR4 2012–2018
Toluene
0.7896 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7990 µg/L
2/25 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
115 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2017
Benzo(A)Pyrene
0.1100 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2017–2019
Xylenes, Total
0.6620 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/25 SYR4 2012–2018
88 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCopperCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DYOGI, JASON W.
Phone
310-285-2483
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Beverly Hills-City, Water Dept.

Is Beverly Hills-City, Water Dept. tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Beverly Hills-City, Water Dept.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Beverly Hills-City, Water Dept.'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Arsenic, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Beverly Hills-City, Water Dept. serve?

Beverly Hills-City, Water Dept. reports serving 40,121 people in California, per its EPA record.

Has Beverly Hills-City, Water Dept. had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 91 violations on file for Beverly Hills-City, Water Dept., of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.