Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromoform | 20.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.6 µg/L | 127/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 43.58 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 82.7 µg/L | 127/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 8255.78 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8682.92 µg/L | 122/134 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 14.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.3 µg/L | 121/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 12.525 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 116/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 13.65 µg/L 273% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L | 88/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L | 85/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0030 mg/L 20% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 82/82 | LCR | 2026 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.435 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L | 80/92 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.33 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 55/92 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 9.765 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L | 48/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 120 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 400 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 410 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 13/92 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 9.983 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.132 µg/L | 11/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 11/92 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 6310 µg/L 63% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8200 µg/L | 8/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.78 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L | 7/92 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lithium | 27 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/13 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.575 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Lead | 8 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
89 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cal/Am Water Company - Baldwin Hills
Is Cal/Am Water Company - Baldwin Hills tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Cal/Am Water Company - Baldwin Hills's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cal/Am Water Company - Baldwin Hills's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromoform, TTHM, Nitrate, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cal/Am Water Company - Baldwin Hills serve?
Cal/Am Water Company - Baldwin Hills reports serving 20,724 people in California, per its EPA record.
Has Cal/Am Water Company - Baldwin Hills had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Cal/Am Water Company - Baldwin Hills, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.