Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-05-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-01-01 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-05-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-04-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-09-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-09-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-09-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-08-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-08-01 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFBS | 0.0032 µg/L | 2/83 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1700 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2100 µg/L | 378/494 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.818 pCi/L 36% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.275 pCi/L | 213/215 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.1 pCi/L 21% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 12 pCi/L | 183/232 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 2.235 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.88 µg/L | 162/212 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 17 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 pCi/L | 117/204 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0230 mg/L 153% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 91/91 | LCR | 2019 |
| Fluoride | 800 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1500 µg/L | 76/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 23.25 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 52 µg/L | 66/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 40.05 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L | 32/82 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 3.21 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 19/82 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.275 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L | 14/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 6.695 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 10/82 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 30.8 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 7/82 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 17.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/84 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Endothall | 5 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 2/81 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Toluene | 95.95 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 96 µg/L | 2/81 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 94 µg/L 1880% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L | 1/80 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Cadmium | 1.2 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/82 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloromethane | 1.1 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/81 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Central Asg
Is Central Asg tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Central Asg's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Central Asg's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Combined Uranium, Gross Beta Particle Activity, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Central Asg serve?
Central Asg reports serving 45,315 people in AS, per its EPA record.
Has Central Asg had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 722 violations on file for Central Asg, of which 75 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.