← Arkansas

Tap water quality report

Kimzey Regional Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
15
detected
12,718
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hot Spring

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2008-04-01 → 2008-04-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2008-04-01 → 2008-04-30
TT Health-based Archived 1993-10-01 → 1993-10-31
TT Health-based Archived 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30
TT Health-based Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
TT Health-based Archived 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
925 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1160 µg/L
211/211 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
70.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
22.905 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.8 µg/L
92/92 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
48.43 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.5 µg/L
92/92 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
25.825 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.2 µg/L
92/92 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
77.16 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 96 µg/L
89/89 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
366.95 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 580 µg/L
38/80 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
36/93 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
369 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
28/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Dibromochloromethane
0.4582 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5200 µg/L
13/119 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
15.15 µg/L 101%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
10/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
1.985 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 pCi/L
2/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.875 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
2/92 SYR4 2012–2019
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FORD, JEFF
Phone
501-865-3490
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kimzey Regional Water District

Is Kimzey Regional Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Kimzey Regional Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kimzey Regional Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kimzey Regional Water District serve?

Kimzey Regional Water District reports serving 12,718 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.

Has Kimzey Regional Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Kimzey Regional Water District, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.