← Arkansas

Tap water quality report

Cross County Rural Water Sys

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
23
detected
8,750
people served
13
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Craighead, Cross, Jackson, Poinsett, St. Francis, Woodruff

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

13
health-based violations
13
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
850 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1060 µg/L
185/188 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
33.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46.8 µg/L
129/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
21.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.4 µg/L
110/113 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
29.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.6 µg/L
103/113 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
24.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.9 µg/L
97/113 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
21.62 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.9 µg/L
97/98 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
93.575 µg/L 117%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 126 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
93/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
9.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.9 µg/L
85/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
9.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L
61/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3968 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4230 µg/L
47/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
344.5 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
32/109 SYR4 2012–2017
Nitrate
3900 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2025
Lead
33.77 µg/L 225%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 52.4 µg/L
10/127 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
10/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
1.94 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
9/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.5 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 pCi/L
6/11 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
6/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
12.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/8 UCMR-5 2024
Arsenic
2.8 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.59 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
5.8 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
86 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
KING, DAVID
Phone
870-697-2632
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cross County Rural Water Sys

Is Cross County Rural Water Sys tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Cross County Rural Water Sys's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cross County Rural Water Sys's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cross County Rural Water Sys serve?

Cross County Rural Water Sys reports serving 8,750 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.

Has Cross County Rural Water Sys had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 13 violations on file for Cross County Rural Water Sys, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.