Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 850 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1060 µg/L | 185/188 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 33.26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46.8 µg/L | 129/134 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 21.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.4 µg/L | 110/113 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 29.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.6 µg/L | 103/113 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 24.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.9 µg/L | 97/113 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 21.62 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.9 µg/L | 97/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 93.575 µg/L 117% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 126 µg/L | 96/96 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 93/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.9 µg/L | 85/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L | 61/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3968 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4230 µg/L | 47/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 344.5 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L | 32/109 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Nitrate | 3900 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 33.77 µg/L 225% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 52.4 µg/L | 10/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.02 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L | 10/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.94 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 9/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.5 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 pCi/L | 6/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 6/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 12.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/8 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Arsenic | 2.8 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 1.59 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 5.8 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cross County Rural Water Sys
Is Cross County Rural Water Sys tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Cross County Rural Water Sys's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cross County Rural Water Sys's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cross County Rural Water Sys serve?
Cross County Rural Water Sys reports serving 8,750 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.
Has Cross County Rural Water Sys had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 13 violations on file for Cross County Rural Water Sys, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.