Tap WaterIndex

← Arkansas

Tap water quality report

City Corporation

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
14
detected
29,260
people served
11
health-based violations
Arkansas rankingsLead in ArkansasPFAS in Arkansas
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pope

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

11
health-based violations
16
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30
TT Health-based Archived 1995-01-01 → 1995-01-31
TT Health-based Archived 1995-01-01 → 1995-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
7.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
129/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
78.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 103 µg/L
129/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30.18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.3 µg/L
125/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
64.54 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 85.7 µg/L
125/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
32.62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46.5 µg/L
125/125 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
86.1 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1037 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
103/103 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L
45/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
238 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 370 µg/L
27/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
310 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 14/14 LCR 2025
Lead
13 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
11/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.155 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
10/137 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
2.9 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
93 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
REVES, STEVEN
Phone
479-968-2105
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City Corporation

Is City Corporation tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in City Corporation's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City Corporation's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City Corporation serve?

City Corporation reports serving 29,260 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.

Has City Corporation had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 16 violations on file for City Corporation, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.