Is Stuttgart Waterworks Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Arkansas

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2001-01-01 → 2001-01-31
Other	Monitoring	Archived	1993-02-01 → 1993-02-28
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1993-02-01 → 1993-02-28
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
Other	Monitoring	Archived	1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Fluoride	1430 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 1960 µg/L	180/180	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	8.71 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10 pCi/L	59/59	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	4.16 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L	37/37	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	290.5 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 490 µg/L	34/60	SYR4	2013–2019
Nitrate	605.5 µg/L 6.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 610 µg/L	30/30	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	660 µg/L 6.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 680 µg/L	28/28	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	7.6 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 18.5 µg/L	25/25	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	18.36 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 28.1 µg/L	25/25	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	37.29 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 60.6 µg/L	19/19	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	271.5 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 280 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	16/16	LCR	2025
Dichloroacetic Acid	6.44 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L	15/19	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	11.49 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 17.3 µg/L	15/19	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	3 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L	14/67	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	2.25 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	8/19	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	2 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L	6/19	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	2.46 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L	4/25	SYR4	2012–2019
Lithium	24.5 µg/L No EPA limit set	4/4	UCMR-5	2024
Monobromoacetic Acid	3.12 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L	2/19	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/19	SYR4	2012–2019

89 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: LAWSON, TOMMY
Phone: 870-673-3246
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Stuttgart Waterworks

Is Stuttgart Waterworks tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Stuttgart Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Stuttgart Waterworks's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Gross Beta Particle Activity, Dibromochloromethane, Copper, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Stuttgart Waterworks serve?

Stuttgart Waterworks reports serving 7,393 people in Arkansas, per its EPA record.

Has Stuttgart Waterworks had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 10 violations on file for Stuttgart Waterworks, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.