← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Russell County Water Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
20
detected
16,923
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Russell

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
27
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-12-07
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-12-07
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Archived 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0056 µg/L 6/10 2024
Pfba 0.0069 µg/L 5/10 2024
Pfpea 0.0068 µg/L 5/10 2024
PFOS 0.0056 µg/L 4/10 2024
PFBS 0.0046 µg/L 3/10 2024
PFOA 0.0058 µg/L 3/10 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
52 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 88.1 µg/L
197/200 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
33.22 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.6 µg/L
197/200 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
552 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1020 µg/L
34/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
468.5 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 630 µg/L
31/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
19/19 LCR 2024
Nitrate-Nitrite
822.5 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1020 µg/L
6/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.444 pCi/L 16%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.68 pCi/L
5/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
856 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 880 µg/L
4/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
10.6 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.256 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.47 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
16.1305 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.8 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.677 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3000 pCi/L 6%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
1.5 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
86 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DEARING., SHEPPARD
Phone
334-297-3393
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Russell County Water Authority

Is Russell County Water Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Russell County Water Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Russell County Water Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, Copper, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Russell County Water Authority serve?

Russell County Water Authority reports serving 16,923 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Russell County Water Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 27 violations on file for Russell County Water Authority, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.