← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Millbrook Utilities

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
23
detected
5,451
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Elmore

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
216
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-07-16 → 2022-10-16
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-07-16 → 2022-10-16

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0092 µg/L 5/6 2025
PFBS 0.0650 µg/L 5/6 2025
Pfhpa 0.0059 µg/L 5/6 2025
Pfhxa 0.0151 µg/L 5/6 2025
PFOA 0.0152 µg/L 5/6 2025
PFOS 0.0181 µg/L 5/6 2025
Pfpea 0.0232 µg/L 5/6 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
60.43 µg/L 76%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 74 µg/L
90/90 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
48.595 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
90/90 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
668 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 674 µg/L
21/23 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.00084 mg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2027
Nitrate
360 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
17.521 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.7 µg/L
8/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.7445 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
4/23 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
395.7 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 402 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
33.26 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.6 pCi/L 17%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.7 pCi/L
2/7 SYR4 2015–2016
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.4000 pCi/L 8%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
Fluoride
59.3 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
0.5000 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2015
Nitrite
201 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HARRIS, MICHAEL
Phone
334-285-3001
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Millbrook Utilities

Is Millbrook Utilities tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Millbrook Utilities's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Millbrook Utilities's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Millbrook Utilities serve?

Millbrook Utilities reports serving 5,451 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Millbrook Utilities had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 216 violations on file for Millbrook Utilities, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.