← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Enterprise, the Wwb of the City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
17
detected
48,000
people served
10
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Coffee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
382
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-08-01 → 1998-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-08-01 → 1998-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-08-01 → 1998-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1995-11-01 → 1995-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1995-11-01 → 1995-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-12-01 → 1994-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-12-01 → 1994-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-12-01 → 1992-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
55.45 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 142 µg/L
52/83 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
28 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
50/51 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
1250 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1490 µg/L
44/51 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
11.76 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
35/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2025
Lead
9 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
13/83 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
7.775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L
10/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
6.05 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 7.7 pCi/L
7/43 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
150 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/336 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
12.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/34 UCMR-5 2024
Bromodichloromethane
2.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
3/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.9 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
3/105 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.19 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
147.5 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
2/53 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
2/55 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.2 pCi/L 24%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Selenium
1 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/53 SYR4 2013–2019
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
COOPER, WILLIAM
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Enterprise, the Wwb of the City of

Is Enterprise, the Wwb of the City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Enterprise, the Wwb of the City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Enterprise, the Wwb of the City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Barium, Fluoride, TTHM, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Enterprise, the Wwb of the City of serve?

Enterprise, the Wwb of the City of reports serving 48,000 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Enterprise, the Wwb of the City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 382 violations on file for Enterprise, the Wwb of the City of, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.