Tap WaterIndex

← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Clio Water Works

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
14
detected
2,832
people served
10
health-based violations
Alabama rankingsLead in AlabamaPFAS in Alabama
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Barbour

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
57
violations on file
7
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-08-01 → 1997-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-08-01 → 1997-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
15.6 pCi/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 58 pCi/L
35/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 15/15 LCR 2019
TTHM
24.37 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.1 µg/L
15/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.063 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.21 µg/L
15/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
220 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 14/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
53.5 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 64 µg/L
11/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
3.725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromodichloromethane
1.774 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane
4.752 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
7.183 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.33 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2017
Fluoride
874 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 880 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.9900 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2014
Nitrate-Nitrite
187.5 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
0.0560 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2014
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PHILLIPS, JOEY
Phone
334-397-2723
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Clio Water Works

Is Clio Water Works tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Clio Water Works's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Clio Water Works's water?

EPA monitoring detected Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Clio Water Works serve?

Clio Water Works reports serving 2,832 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Clio Water Works had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 57 violations on file for Clio Water Works, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 7 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.