Tap WaterIndex

← Alabama

Tap water quality report

Prattville, the Ww Board of the City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
24
detected
46,614
people served
2
health-based violations
Alabama rankingsLead in AlabamaPFAS in Alabama
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Autauga

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
365
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-07-01 → 2000-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-07-01 → 2000-07-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0883 µg/L 8/27 2025
Pfpea 0.0328 µg/L 8/27 2025
Pfhxa 0.0216 µg/L 7/27 2025
PFOA 0.0192 µg/L 5/27 2025
PFOS 0.0228 µg/L 5/27 2025
Pfba 0.0147 µg/L 1/27 2025
Pfhpa 0.0076 µg/L 1/27 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
64.175 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.6 µg/L
76/123 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
410 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 910 µg/L
60/292 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
72.1 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.8 µg/L
49/59 SYR4 2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
23.47 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.6 µg/L
47/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.012 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.26 µg/L
35/59 SYR4 2016–2019
Chloroform
34.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42 µg/L
32/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
39.575 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.6 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Fluoride
850.55 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 880 µg/L
20/26 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
0.0035 mg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 19/19 LCR 2025
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.75 pCi/L 18%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.2 pCi/L
15/18 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
9.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
14/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.709 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
7/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Chlorobenzene
0.7773 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7970 µg/L
3/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3855 pCi/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.3900 pCi/L
2/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
8.29 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
193.4 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 196 µg/L
2/29 SYR4 2016–2019
Xylenes, Total
0.9361 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9500 µg/L
2/64 SYR4 2012–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BUCKNER, JASPER N. BUDDY
Phone
334-365-6783
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Prattville, the Ww Board of the City of

Is Prattville, the Ww Board of the City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Prattville, the Ww Board of the City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Prattville, the Ww Board of the City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Nitrate, Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Prattville, the Ww Board of the City of serve?

Prattville, the Ww Board of the City of reports serving 46,614 people in Alabama, per its EPA record.

Has Prattville, the Ww Board of the City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 365 violations on file for Prattville, the Ww Board of the City of, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.