Tap WaterIndex

← New Mexico

Tap water quality report

Santo Domingo Pueblo

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
17
detected
5,328
people served
35
health-based violations
New Mexico rankingsLead in New MexicoPFAS in New Mexico
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Native American

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

35
health-based violations
122
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2010-07-02
TT Health-based Resolved 2010-07-02
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-12-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
119.6 µg/L 9.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 28/28 LCR 2023
Lead
4.635 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
12/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
7.314 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.71 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
9.304 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.79 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.74 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.675 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.74 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.506 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.61 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
18.8 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Fluoride
550 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Arsenic
1.8 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 2/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Bromodichloromethane
0.6572 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6630 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
3.585 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
1400 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
1.8 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 2/3 SYR4 2012–2015
Lithium
84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/2 UCMR-5 2024
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.41 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Raymond Aguilar
Phone
5054652214
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Santo Domingo Pueblo

Is Santo Domingo Pueblo tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Santo Domingo Pueblo's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Santo Domingo Pueblo's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromoform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Santo Domingo Pueblo serve?

Santo Domingo Pueblo reports serving 5,328 people in New Mexico, per its EPA record.

Has Santo Domingo Pueblo had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 122 violations on file for Santo Domingo Pueblo, of which 35 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.