← New Mexico

Tap water quality report

Jemez Pueblo

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 81 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

81
contaminants tested
18
detected
3,200
people served
21
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Native American

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

21
health-based violations
57
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromoform
46.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61.4 µg/L
39/39 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
82.95 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.8 µg/L
39/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
28.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.1 µg/L
38/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
18.4 µg/L 184%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
37/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
8.6125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L
36/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
11.575 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L
36/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
13.6 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.1 µg/L
36/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
1.746 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.49 µg/L
30/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
29/29 LCR 2025
Copper
632 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1440 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2013–2016
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.206 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.11 µg/L
17/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
6/21 SYR4 2013–2016
Barium
426 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 430 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2018
Fluoride
1090 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
7.412 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.43 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.02 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.03 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.098 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
5.015 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2017–2018
63 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
George Shendo
Phone
5758347359
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Jemez Pueblo

Is Jemez Pueblo tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Jemez Pueblo's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Jemez Pueblo's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromoform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Arsenic, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Jemez Pueblo serve?

Jemez Pueblo reports serving 3,200 people in New Mexico, per its EPA record.

Has Jemez Pueblo had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 57 violations on file for Jemez Pueblo, of which 21 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.