Tap WaterIndex

← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Kickapoo Housing Complex

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
18
detected
499
people served
1
health-based violations
Oklahoma rankingsLead in OklahomaPFAS in Oklahoma
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Native American

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
17
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2013-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2013-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2013-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-08-01 → 2009-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-08-01 → 2009-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-08-01 → 2009-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
2056 µg/L 158%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 4060 µg/L
130/130 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0050 mg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 45/45 LCR 2020
Lead
5.365 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L
30/130 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
2090 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.754 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.82 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
39.985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.9 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
2.4805 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.68 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
24.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.3 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
72.2 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 77.3 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.722 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.16 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.574 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
11.783 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.01 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.04 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2015
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.4755 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
121 µg/L 6.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.08 pCi/L 42%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
Fluoride
160 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.07 pCi/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Marlon Frye
Phone
4059644227
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kickapoo Housing Complex

Is Kickapoo Housing Complex tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Kickapoo Housing Complex's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kickapoo Housing Complex's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kickapoo Housing Complex serve?

Kickapoo Housing Complex reports serving 499 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Kickapoo Housing Complex had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for Kickapoo Housing Complex, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.