← Wyoming

Tap water quality report

White Mountain W&S District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
3,000
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Sweetwater

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
37.75 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
62.6 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
43.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.995 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
18.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
953 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2150 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.075 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
16/22 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
13/20 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.755 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
10/22 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.7225 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7300 µg/L
2/22 SYR4 2014–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact
OLGUIN, MAX CASEY
Phone
307-362-3937
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about White Mountain W&S District

Is White Mountain W&S District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in White Mountain W&S District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in White Mountain W&S District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does White Mountain W&S District serve?

White Mountain W&S District reports serving 3,000 people in Wyoming, per its EPA record.

Has White Mountain W&S District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for White Mountain W&S District.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.