Is Bridger Valley Joint Powers Board Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Surface water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Uinta

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-06-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31
TT	Health-based	Archived	1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28
TT	Health-based	Archived	1994-12-01 → 1994-12-31
TT	Health-based	Archived	1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30
TT	Health-based	Archived	1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-04-01 → 2004-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-04-01 → 2004-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-04-01 → 2004-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
TTHM	84.45 µg/L 106% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 105 µg/L	40/40	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	71.63 µg/L 119% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L worst single sample: 83 µg/L	34/34	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	505.8 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 643 µg/L	29/30	SYR4	2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane	23 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 26 µg/L	28/28	SYR4	2014–2019
Chloroform	73.2 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 77.6 µg/L	28/28	SYR4	2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane	7.21 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L	27/28	SYR4	2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	34.8 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 36 µg/L	23/23	SYR4	2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	36.8 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 45 µg/L	23/23	SYR4	2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.56 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L	18/23	SYR4	2014–2019
Lead	21 µg/L 140% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L	18/30	SYR4	2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid	4.565 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L	18/23	SYR4	2014–2019
Lead	0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	13/13	LCR	2023
Barium	200 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Fluoride	790 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 1000 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	0.8670 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.8700 µg/L	7/28	SYR4	2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	0.8840 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.9200 µg/L	5/23	SYR4	2014–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	38 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 40 µg/L	3/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	3.155 pCi/L 63% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 3.3 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2013–2019
Thallium, Total	1.46 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L	2/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Arsenic	1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L	1/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	1.2 pCi/L 8% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L	1/2	SYR4	2013–2019
Selenium	1 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L	1/8	SYR4	2012–2019

60 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: ANDERSEN, TROY
Phone: 307-782-3130
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Bridger Valley Joint Powers Board

Is Bridger Valley Joint Powers Board tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Bridger Valley Joint Powers Board's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Bridger Valley Joint Powers Board's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Bridger Valley Joint Powers Board serve?

Bridger Valley Joint Powers Board reports serving 1,728 people in Wyoming, per its EPA record.

Has Bridger Valley Joint Powers Board had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 35 violations on file for Bridger Valley Joint Powers Board, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.