← Wyoming

Tap water quality report

Lance Creek Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
16
detected
45
people served
98
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Niobrara

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

98
health-based violations
361
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2026-03-28
TT Health-based Unaddressed 2023-08-16
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
5.6 µg/L 56%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L
29/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
11 pCi/L 220%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
21.065 pCi/L 140%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 21.325 pCi/L
17/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0110 mg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2026
Copper
168.5 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Uranium
1.3 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
10/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.25 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
6/12 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
11.96 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.7315 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.79 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
2.885 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
1.3125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.35 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.227 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.32 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.7295 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.07 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Fluoride
400 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2018
Barium
100 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2018
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ITURREY (MCGUIRE), MEGAN
Phone
000-000-0000
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lance Creek Water District

Is Lance Creek Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Lance Creek Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lance Creek Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Lead, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lance Creek Water District serve?

Lance Creek Water District reports serving 45 people in Wyoming, per its EPA record.

Has Lance Creek Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 361 violations on file for Lance Creek Water District, of which 98 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.