← Wyoming

Tap water quality report

Kemmerer-Diamondville Jpb

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
18
detected
3,348
people served
51
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lincoln

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

51
health-based violations
60
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
126.1 µg/L 158%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 143 µg/L
67/67 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
66.24 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 76 µg/L
65/65 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.33 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
105.98 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 126 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36 µg/L
44/44 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
35.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
44/44 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
630 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1010 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2015–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
22/44 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
16/48 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
4.4 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L
13/40 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2024
Fluoride
200 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
100 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.1000 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
2/44 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.3500 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/44 SYR4 2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.1 pCi/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
6 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/9 SYR4 2012–2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MCCLARNON, BRENT
Phone
307-877-2261
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kemmerer-Diamondville Jpb

Is Kemmerer-Diamondville Jpb tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Kemmerer-Diamondville Jpb's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kemmerer-Diamondville Jpb's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kemmerer-Diamondville Jpb serve?

Kemmerer-Diamondville Jpb reports serving 3,348 people in Wyoming, per its EPA record.

Has Kemmerer-Diamondville Jpb had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 60 violations on file for Kemmerer-Diamondville Jpb, of which 51 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.