← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Lubeck Psd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 77 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

77
contaminants tested
19
detected
11,724
people served
11
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Wood

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

11
health-based violations
78
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1994-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
879.8 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1790 µg/L
70/70 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
1.935 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.4 µg/L
54/70 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.00095 mg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2024
Nitrate
1960 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
8.104 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.9 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.166 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.55 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.112 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.24 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
36.98 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.4 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.918 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.96 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
11/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
6/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
40.4 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 40.5 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
1041 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1050 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.782 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.79 µg/L
3/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
0.6000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.5560 pCi/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1620 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MARTIN, JERRY

Frequently asked questions about Lubeck Psd

Is Lubeck Psd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Lubeck Psd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lubeck Psd's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lubeck Psd serve?

Lubeck Psd reports serving 11,724 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Lubeck Psd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 78 violations on file for Lubeck Psd, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.