Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-06-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-06-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2025-06-20 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-08-19 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-08-19 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-08-19 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-08-19 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-08-19 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-08-19 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-08-19 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 5934 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6200 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 34/34 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 849.05 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2900 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 16.4 µg/L 328% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 27/33 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 4 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 21/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 905 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 930 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 9.805 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.4 µg/L | 6/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.63 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.15 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.77 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.476 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.77 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 11.778 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.419 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 51.17 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 51.4 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.2595 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.26 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.819 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.84 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.545 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.85 pCi/L 12% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.31 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3050 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Nitrite | 410 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Selenium | 3.8 µg/L 7.6% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Paden City, City of
Is Paden City, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Paden City, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Paden City, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Copper, Tetrachloroethylene, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Paden City, City of serve?
Paden City, City of reports serving 3,291 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Paden City, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 822 violations on file for Paden City, City of, of which 114 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 72 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.