← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Adrian P S D

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
5,327
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Mixed public/private
Counties served
Upshur

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
38
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-03
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-03
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-03
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-01-03
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-07-01 → 1991-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-07-01 → 1991-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-07-01 → 1991-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-07-01 → 1991-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
13.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
67.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 88.4 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
81.795 µg/L 102%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 99.8 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
33.08 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 58 µg/L
53/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.98 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.8 µg/L
52/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.5 µg/L
51/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L
45/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
90.3 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 135 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
1.235 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
14/30 SYR4 2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.5115 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.09 µg/L
14/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2026
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.455 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
8/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.8800 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/54 SYR4 2012–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
SPENCER, PAUL
Phone
000-000-0000

Frequently asked questions about Adrian P S D

Is Adrian P S D tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Adrian P S D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Adrian P S D's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Adrian P S D serve?

Adrian P S D reports serving 5,327 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Adrian P S D had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 38 violations on file for Adrian P S D, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.