← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Southwestern Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
5,296
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Taylor

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
74
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
82.75 µg/L 6.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 99 µg/L
58/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
121.99 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 157.3 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.235 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.5 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
131.285 µg/L 164%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 166 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
59.435 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.1 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
29.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.9 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
16/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.00024 mg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2024
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.8000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
29.1 µg/L 194%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L
5/60 SYR4 2013–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
BARNEY, DONNIS
Phone
304-739-2418
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Southwestern Water District

Is Southwestern Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Southwestern Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Southwestern Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Southwestern Water District serve?

Southwestern Water District reports serving 5,296 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Southwestern Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 74 violations on file for Southwestern Water District, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.