← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Grafton City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
6,333
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Taylor

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
87
violations on file
19
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-15
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-15
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
85.3 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 122 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.084 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.95 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
76.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 80.6 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
85.28 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 90.2 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
65.96 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.2 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
33.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.6 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30.245 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.6 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.868 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
25/33 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.669 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.87 µg/L
23/33 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.00041 mg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2025
Lead
11.93 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
12/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.6735 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.03 µg/L
2/33 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
0.6400 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/33 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/33 SYR4 2014–2019

Utility contact

Contact
SETLER, JASON
Phone
304-612-2166
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Grafton City of

Is Grafton City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Grafton City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Grafton City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Grafton City of serve?

Grafton City of reports serving 6,333 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Grafton City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 87 violations on file for Grafton City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 19 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.