Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.6 µg/L | 129/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 41.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50.6 µg/L | 129/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 53.08 µg/L 66% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.4 µg/L | 129/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.6 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 48.165 µg/L 80% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 73.9 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 23.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.8 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.848 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 125/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.4765 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L | 104/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 369.45 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1650 µg/L | 92/92 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 3.6 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L | 61/92 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.385 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.68 µg/L | 35/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.68 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.28 µg/L | 14/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 210 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 34.125 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.3 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 902 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.3000 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.1990 pCi/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Nitrite | 290 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Selenium | 1 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Putnam P S D
Is Putnam P S D tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Putnam P S D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Putnam P S D's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Putnam P S D serve?
Putnam P S D reports serving 26,410 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Putnam P S D had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 13 violations on file for Putnam P S D, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.