Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 374.5 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 15.535 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.8 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 50.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65.2 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.664 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.79 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 30.125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.3 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 71.075 µg/L 89% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 82.9 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 59.535 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.9 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 25.94 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.6 µg/L | 54/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 12.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.9 µg/L | 49/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 1.775 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L | 35/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Lead | 0.00054 mg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 19/19 | LCR | 2026 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.446 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.51 µg/L | 17/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 850 µg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 970 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1020 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 55.04 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.8 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.436 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.24 µg/L | 7/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.7900 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L | 3/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.3000 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 14 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.4760 pCi/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.1 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Hurricane City of
Is Hurricane City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Hurricane City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Hurricane City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Hurricane City of serve?
Hurricane City of reports serving 8,987 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Hurricane City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 14 violations on file for Hurricane City of, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.