← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Paw Paw Water Works

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 77 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

77
contaminants tested
22
detected
524
people served
29
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Morgan

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

29
health-based violations
370
violations on file
13
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
TT Health-based Archived 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
TT Health-based Archived 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-12-01 → 2024-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-12-01 → 2024-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-12-01 → 2024-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-12-01 → 2024-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
31.14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.4 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
90.8 µg/L 114%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 113.1 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
25.445 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.7 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
32.18 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.3 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
58.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 84 µg/L
31/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
16.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.7 µg/L
31/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L
31/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
438.05 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 930 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0019 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
19/19 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
18/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
14.32 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L
17/30 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
6.725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
16/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1600 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
10/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
64.75 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
796 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 810 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.244 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.28 µg/L
5/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.1100 pCi/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Ethylene Dibromide
0.0250 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
410 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Nitrite
290 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Selenium
2.4 µg/L 4.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ABE, DARLENE
Phone
304-947-7476
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Paw Paw Water Works

Is Paw Paw Water Works tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Paw Paw Water Works's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Paw Paw Water Works's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Paw Paw Water Works serve?

Paw Paw Water Works reports serving 524 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Paw Paw Water Works had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 370 violations on file for Paw Paw Water Works, of which 29 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 13 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.